Agentic AI Needs a Safety Stamp
MathWorks' TÜV SÜD-certified guidance for agentic AI in engineering workflows previews how manufacturers will have to govern AI coding agents in safety-critical systems.
MathWorks' TÜV SÜD-certified guidance for agentic AI in engineering workflows previews how manufacturers will have to govern AI coding agents in safety-critical systems.
Automotive, aviation, energy, and healthcare are taking four distinct regulatory postures on agentic AI, and compliance leaders cannot assume one will predict another.
MathWorks and FERC are solving the same AI assurance problem from opposite ends, and neither one answers the AI governance question regulators are building next.
Safety-critical manufacturing is splitting into standards that admit AI as verification evidence and standards that exclude it by design, and buyers need to know which applies.
Industrial AI's real growth this week is in engineering tooling and sensing, not in safety-rated control, and that boundary is the diligence question that matters.
Vendors are certifying AI tooling for safety-critical systems while FERC's own CIP audits are finding the AI access risks that certification is supposed to prevent.